“Let our engineers run coding agents in parallel on isolated branches, so we could explore and ship faster.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗
Conductor
Mac app for running several coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) in parallel, each in an isolated copy of the repo, then reviewing and merging their changes.
Works with AI agents:llms.txtWhere it fits
How Conductor itself is built
5 tools, from its own code, website and Product Hunt page.
Who uses it
23 makers' products, each linked to the source that shows it.
“Part of the team that makes MindPal!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Small team. Many agents.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Great for us to build out the entire product across the whole team now.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Conductor turned Claude Code from one agent into a whole team. Instead of babysitting a single session, I fan out work across parallel agents and come back to a stack of finished branches. For a small team moving fast, this is the unlock. nothing else made running multiple Claude Codes feel this clean.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Conductor makes it simple for us to use AI to work on our code base and create the workflows we need, all with a beautiful UI.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“As we progressed from traditional IDEs to Cursor and finally to Conductor we finally found the tool that lets us build with the speed of agents. Highly recommend!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“give it a go and I don't need to explain myself :)”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Nicely designed, love the muni sound”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Conductor is great for managing Claude Code and Codex sessions in one place, and for working on multiple different features at once for Fluxmail.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“We chose Conductor because working with multiple coding agents requires a clear way to manage their work. For Stile, isolated workspaces let us tackle different tickets in parallel while keeping each change scoped and reviewable. Having Claude Code and Codex within the same workflow makes it easier to organize implementation, follow progress, and review the resulting changes. That combination of parallel execution and clear separation is particularly valuable when building identity-verification software, where we need to understand exactly what changed before shipping it.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Helped us run multiple agents at once to ship at lightning speeds!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Conductor makes agent orchestration approachable and keeps me in my flow state”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Use Conductor to manage sessions between Claude Code and Codex”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Amazing Claude Code orchestrator!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“We constantly have multiple work streams in development and the constant feature releases shows how invested the team are at making it better.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Conductor with Anthropic models! Super handy.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“My favourite IDE to parallelize agentic work between different projects”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“We use it daily at our company to run multiple coding agents. It helps us build faster than ever before. Keep it up!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Helped us manage multiple workspaces and agents in parallel, speeding up development”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Awesome UI on top of the terminal based clunky agents!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“We love the subtle sound allowing us to quickly switch between many different sessions!”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗“Lets me run several Claude Code and Codex sessions in parallel on separate branches.”
AI Coding AssistantsMaker says so · source ↗What makers say
17 makers on why they use Conductor, in their own words on Product Hunt.
We chose Conductor because working with multiple coding agents requires a clear way to manage their work. For Stile, isolated workspaces let us tackle different tickets in parallel while keeping each change scoped and reviewable. Having Claude Code and Codex within the same workflow makes it easier to organize implementation, follow progress, and review the resulting changes. That combination of parallel execution and clear separation is particularly valuable when building identity-verification software, where we need to understand exactly what changed before shipping it.
We chose Conductor because working with multiple coding agents requires a clear way to manage their work. For Stile, isolated workspaces let us tackle different tickets in parallel while keeping each change scoped and reviewable. Having Claude Code and Codex within the same workflow makes it easier to organize implementation, follow progress, and review the resulting changes. That combination of parallel execution and clear separation is particularly valuable when building identity-verification software, where we need to understand exactly what changed before shipping it.
Conductor turned Claude Code from one agent into a whole team. Instead of babysitting a single session, I fan out work across parallel agents and come back to a stack of finished branches. For a small team moving fast, this is the unlock. nothing else made running multiple Claude Codes feel this clean.
As we progressed from traditional IDEs to Cursor and finally to Conductor we finally found the tool that lets us build with the speed of agents. Highly recommend!
Napkin MathSep 2026 ↗Conductor is great for managing Claude Code and Codex sessions in one place, and for working on multiple different features at once for Fluxmail.
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises, with how Product Hunt tags its reviews.
Alternatives to Conductor
All alternatives by situation →On Product Hunt, people weigh it against: Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Google Antigravity.
Questions makers ask about Conductor
Is Conductor free?
Yes — there is a free tier a small product can run on; paid use starts at $50/mo. source ↗
Is Conductor open source or self-hostable?
Not open source, and hosted only.
Can AI coding agents work with Conductor?
It serves an llms.txt docs index.
Who uses Conductor?
23 makers' products we track, each with a source. source ↗