Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Two sides of the AI coding assistants decision: AI-first editor and editor plugin. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Cursor if
  • You want to see and steer each change inside your editor

Use it whenYou like working in an editor and want to see and steer each change as it happens.

Trade-offHeavy agent use is billed through credits, so costs can grow beyond the base plan.

Choose GitHub Copilot if
  • You don't want to change editors

Use it whenYou don't want to change editors, or you want to start on a free tier.

Trade-offDeeper agent features vary by editor, and heavy use counts against plan limits.

At a glance

CursorGitHub Copilot
Used by538 makers' products26 makers' products
Cost at default usagedevelopers 1 seat$20/mo Pro$10/mo Pro
Moved to it on GitHubpull requests since Oct 20248 from GitHub Copilotfewer than 3
Downloads
PricingFree Hobby tier; paid Pro/Pro+/Ultra individual plans and per-seat Teams/Enterprise plans, usage billed via credits. · paid from $20/moFree tier with limited completions; paid individual plans and per-seat Business/Enterprise plans with pooled usage credits. · paid from $10/mo
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceNoNo
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page50+ (15 major)50+ (15 major)

Who moves from one to the other

Public pull requests on GitHub since Oct 2024 whose title says "Cursor to GitHub Copilot" or the reverse — real code changes, by developers in general rather than makers only.

GitHub Copilot → Cursor8 PRs
All matching pull requests on GitHub ↗
Fewer than 3 pull requests move from Cursor to GitHub Copilot.

What makers say

Makers on using it for AI coding assistants, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Cursor
Cursor was our main AI assisted IDE for coding. Writing complex backend logic became so much faster. It literally feels like having a senior developer building the product with you.
Askiva AI, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Fork of VSCode with an agentic coding focus. Especially easy to manage models and spin up multi-model results for a single query and have all the work trees handled automagically.
Astropad Workbench, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Cursor speeds up our coding. It’s like a better version of GitHub Copilot and lets us chat with our codebase, making it easier to navigate and understand. Cant go back without this.
Central, the makerSep 2026 ↗
344 more on the Cursor page →
On GitHub Copilot
Our token compression technology has to be compatible and efficient with Github Copilot, so we have to use it extensively to understand how we can optimize its context.
Edgee, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Copilot is everywhere, but it often works in isolation. Stash MCP bridges it to your team’s repos, issues, and docs. Making Copilot way more context-aware.
Stash, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Copilot was the first agent I ran inside scritty every day; it set the bar for what a CLI agent's capture and replay had to feel like.
scritty, the makerSep 2026 ↗
17 more on the GitHub Copilot page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

Cursor
Most loved
  • Tab completion is fast and accurate, and stays useful when hand-editing code or when agents fall short on large tasks. PHHNHN 2PH 2
  • Changes arrive as reviewable diffs in the editor, keeping the developer in control in bite-size steps. PHHNHN 2PH 2
  • Chatting with the codebase in context helps developers navigate and understand unfamiliar code. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
Watch-outs
  • The subscription feels pricey next to Claude or Codex plugins, and premium model requests add per-use costs. HNHN 2
  • The agent can claim a bug is fixed without seeing the running app, so output has to be checked and tested by hand. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 956 reviews · mentioned most: seamless integration, intelligent code suggestions, code generation · complaints: context aware, occasional crashes
GitHub Copilot
Most loved
  • Inline completions work in every major IDE, including Vim and Visual Studio, cutting boilerplate as you type. PHPH 2
  • One subscription gives a choice of models from several labs, including some free ones. PHHN
  • Deep editor integration, such as a semantic index of the solution in Visual Studio and a read-only plan mode in VS Code. HNHN 2PH
Watch-outs
  • The switch to usage-based billing made it far worse value, driving people to other tools. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • As an agent harness it trails Claude Code and Codex, with truncated or bloated context that confuses models. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • Built-in pull request review misses too much and raises many wrong findings. HN
On Product Hunt: 4.8★, 34 reviews · mentioned most: productivity boost, suggests code snippets, focus on problem-solving

Who uses each

Used by both — often one replacing the other, or each for a different part of the product

What makers pair each with

With Cursor
With GitHub Copilot
Transactional Email
Hosting
Frontend Framework
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)AI-first editorA VS Code-style editor with unlimited Tab completions, an in-editor agent, and one place to manage local and cloud Devin agents.vs Cursor →vs GitHub Copilot →
Claude CodeTerminal agentHanding off multi-step tasks — features, refactors, bug hunts — to an agent that reads the repo, edits files and runs commands.vs Cursor →vs GitHub Copilot →
OpenAI CodexTerminal agentDelegating tasks to an agent in the terminal, IDE or desktop app, or to cloud tasks that run in the background and open pull requests.vs Cursor →vs GitHub Copilot →
OpenCodeTerminal agentAn open-source coding agent that works with almost any model provider, local models, or an existing Copilot or ChatGPT subscription.vs Cursor →