GitHub Copilot vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Two sides of the AI coding assistants decision: editor plugin and AI-first editor. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)AI-first editorllms.txtAcquired: Now part of Cognition, maker of Devin; windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai. source
Which fits you
- You don't want to change editors
Use it whenYou don't want to change editors, or you want to start on a free tier.
Trade-offDeeper agent features vary by editor, and heavy use counts against plan limits.
- You want to see and steer each change inside your editor
Use it whenYou want an AI editor with a free tier and plan to hand some tasks to Devin cloud agents.
Trade-offRecently renamed from Windsurf to Devin Desktop and reshaped around Cognition's agents; paid plans run on quotas, with extra usage at API rates.
At a glance
| Used by | 26 makers' products | 43 makers' products |
|---|---|---|
| Cost at default usagedevelopers 1 seat | $10/mo Pro | $20/mo Pro |
| Downloads | ||
| Pricing | Free tier with limited completions; paid individual plans and per-seat Business/Enterprise plans with pooled usage credits. · paid from $10/mo | Free tier with a light agent quota; Pro $20/month, Max $200/month; Teams $80/month plus $40 per developer seat; extra usage billed at API rates; custom Enterprise. · paid from $20/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page | 50+ (15 major) | 13 (9 major) |
What makers say
Makers on using it for AI coding assistants, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.
Our token compression technology has to be compatible and efficient with Github Copilot, so we have to use it extensively to understand how we can optimize its context.
Copilot is everywhere, but it often works in isolation. Stash MCP bridges it to your team’s repos, issues, and docs. Making Copilot way more context-aware.
Copilot was the first agent I ran inside scritty every day; it set the bar for what a CLI agent's capture and replay had to feel like.
Windsurf is amazing. It's our go to code editor and is amazing to use to help us build out new features and fix bugs in our application! Its especially amazing to use with Claude!
Windsurf has been a joy to use. It’s fast, clean, and optimized for modern AI workflows. It helped me iterate quickly and stay in flow during long development sessions.
Windsurf's agentic IDE capabilities were essential for managing complex refactors and deep logic changes. It acted as my co-pilot during the entire 1,800-hour journey.
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.
- Inline completions work in every major IDE, including Vim and Visual Studio, cutting boilerplate as you type. PHPH 2
- One subscription gives a choice of models from several labs, including some free ones. PHHN
- Deep editor integration, such as a semantic index of the solution in Visual Studio and a read-only plan mode in VS Code. HNHN 2PH
- The switch to usage-based billing made it far worse value, driving people to other tools. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
- As an agent harness it trails Claude Code and Codex, with truncated or bloated context that confuses models. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
- Built-in pull request review misses too much and raises many wrong findings. HN
- The Cascade agent iterates on its own suggestions and applies changes without constant manual approval. PHPH 2PH 3
- Context handling is strong: it tracks recent edits and pulls the right files, helping across large codebases. PHPH 2PH 3
- The editor feels fast, lightweight and clean, keeping developers in flow during long sessions. PHPH 2
