Claude Code vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)
Two sides of the AI coding assistants decision: terminal agent and AI-first editor. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)AI-first editorllms.txtAcquired: Now part of Cognition, maker of Devin; windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai. source
Which fits you
- You're comfortable in a terminal and want to hand off whole tasks
Use it whenYou're comfortable in a terminal and want the agent to do the work while you review.
Trade-offUses Anthropic models only, and needs a Claude subscription or API credits.
- You want to see and steer each change inside your editor
Use it whenYou want an AI editor with a free tier and plan to hand some tasks to Devin cloud agents.
Trade-offRecently renamed from Windsurf to Devin Desktop and reshaped around Cognition's agents; paid plans run on quotas, with extra usage at API rates.
At a glance
| Used by | 737 makers' products · 88 open-source projects | 43 makers' products |
|---|---|---|
| Cost at default usagedevelopers 1 seat | $20/mo Pro | $20/mo Pro |
| Downloads | 18.9M/wk | |
| Pricing | Included in Claude Pro/Max subscriptions or billed via Anthropic API token usage. · paid from $20/mo | Free tier with a light agent quota; Pro $20/month, Max $200/month; Teams $80/month plus $40 per developer seat; extra usage billed at API rates; custom Enterprise. · paid from $20/mo |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | No |
| Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page | 50+ (21 major) | 13 (9 major) |
What makers say
Makers on using it for AI coding assistants, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.
We build HarnessRouter with Claude Code, and HarnessRouter runs Claude Code as a product backend for other teams. It is both our daily driver and one of the harnesses we route to.
We use Claude Code as our AI agent that addresses and responds to PR review comments. The headless mode made it incredibly easy to run an agent with repository context in a sandbox.
Claude Code in VS Code is the closest thing to pair programming with a senior engineer. It reads my codebase, runs commands, and ships PRs right inside the editor I already live in.
Windsurf is amazing. It's our go to code editor and is amazing to use to help us build out new features and fix bugs in our application! Its especially amazing to use with Claude!
Windsurf has been a joy to use. It’s fast, clean, and optimized for modern AI workflows. It helped me iterate quickly and stay in flow during long development sessions.
Windsurf's agentic IDE capabilities were essential for managing complex refactors and deep logic changes. It acted as my co-pilot during the entire 1,800-hour journey.
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.
- Holds deep context across large multi-module codebases, so one change can span UI, backend, docs and infrastructure. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
- Carries complex multi-step tasks through end to end, such as waiting on CI, reading logs and iterating until green. PHHNHN 2PH 2
- Hooks, skills, subagents, plugins and MCP make it a host that teams extend and build products on. PHPH 2HNPH 3
- Quality can shift between releases because of harness changes, such as a quietly lowered default reasoning effort. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
- Subagents are opaque and hard to steer, and the default setup feels heavy, so power users strip tools and prompts. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
- The subscription only works inside Claude Code, not in other harnesses people prefer. HNHN 2HN 3
- The Cascade agent iterates on its own suggestions and applies changes without constant manual approval. PHPH 2PH 3
- Context handling is strong: it tracks recent edits and pulls the right files, helping across large codebases. PHPH 2PH 3
- The editor feels fast, lightweight and clean, keeping developers in flow during long sessions. PHPH 2
