Claude Code vs OpenCode

Two terminal agent options for AI coding assistants. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Claude Code if
  • You're comfortable in a terminal and want to hand off whole tasks

Use it whenYou're comfortable in a terminal and want the agent to do the work while you review.

Trade-offUses Anthropic models only, and needs a Claude subscription or API credits.

Choose OpenCode if
  • You want to switch between model providers freely or keep your tools open source

Use it whenYou want to switch models freely or keep your agent tooling open source.

Trade-offResult quality depends on the model you connect, and you manage provider keys and costs yourself.

At a glance

Claude CodeOpenCode
Used by737 makers' products · 88 open-source projects42 makers' products
Cost at default usagedevelopers 1 seat$20/mo Pro$10/mo Go
Moved to it on GitHubpull requests since Oct 202428 from OpenCode44 from Claude Code
Downloads18.9M/wk★ 210.3k
PricingIncluded in Claude Pro/Max subscriptions or billed via Anthropic API token usage. · paid from $20/moFree (open source, MIT) with your own model provider or subscription; optional paid model access through OpenCode Zen (pay as you go) or OpenCode Go ($10/month). · paid from $10/mo
Free tierNoYes
Open sourceNoYes
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page50+ (21 major)no public status feed

Who moves from one to the other

Public pull requests on GitHub since Oct 2024 whose title says "Claude Code to OpenCode" or the reverse — real code changes, by developers in general rather than makers only.

Claude Code → OpenCode44 PRs
All matching pull requests on GitHub ↗

What makers say

Makers on using it for AI coding assistants, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Claude Code
We build HarnessRouter with Claude Code, and HarnessRouter runs Claude Code as a product backend for other teams. It is both our daily driver and one of the harnesses we route to.
HarnessRouter, the makerSep 2026 ↗
We use Claude Code as our AI agent that addresses and responds to PR review comments. The headless mode made it incredibly easy to run an agent with repository context in a sandbox.
Merge, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Claude Code in VS Code is the closest thing to pair programming with a senior engineer. It reads my codebase, runs commands, and ships PRs right inside the editor I already live in.
Weavable, the makerSep 2026 ↗
529 more on the Claude Code page →
On OpenCode
A strong open local coding-agent runtime. We like it because it keeps agent work close to the developer environment while still fitting into a shared workspace through Vokal.
Vokal, the makerSep 2026 ↗
One of the agents the manager runs. Its config merge is how the manager registers itself as an MCP server inside a session, so an agent can rename itself and declare the repo it is working in.
agent-manager, the makerSep 2026 ↗
OpenCode has been part of my day-to-day development workflow while building Kapshot. It helped me explore ideas, iterate quickly, debug issues, and spend more time actually shipping the product.
Kapshot, the makerSep 2026 ↗
23 more on the OpenCode page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

Claude Code
Most loved
  • Holds deep context across large multi-module codebases, so one change can span UI, backend, docs and infrastructure. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
  • Carries complex multi-step tasks through end to end, such as waiting on CI, reading logs and iterating until green. PHHNHN 2PH 2
  • Hooks, skills, subagents, plugins and MCP make it a host that teams extend and build products on. PHPH 2HNPH 3
Watch-outs
  • Quality can shift between releases because of harness changes, such as a quietly lowered default reasoning effort. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • Subagents are opaque and hard to steer, and the default setup feels heavy, so power users strip tools and prompts. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • The subscription only works inside Claude Code, not in other harnesses people prefer. HNHN 2HN 3
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 736 reviews · mentioned most: code generation, complex software tasks, massive context window
OpenCode
Most loved
  • Works with models from any provider, so teams run a strong model on hard work and a cheap one on grunt tasks. PHHNHN 2
  • Open source with an SDK and plugin system, so products are built on it without vendor lock-in. PHHN
  • The low-cost Go plan gives heavy usage of open models and rarely hits limits. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
Watch-outs
  • Session management and prompt caching have been unreliable for some users. HNHN 2
  • It is more opinionated and harder to hack on than minimal harnesses, and some find its code sloppy. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 49 reviews

Who uses each

Used by both — often one replacing the other, or each for a different part of the product

What makers pair each with

With Claude Code
CursorAI-first editorA VS Code-style editor with AI completions, chat and agents built in, keeping your VS Code extensions.vs Claude Code →vs OpenCode →
Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)AI-first editorA VS Code-style editor with unlimited Tab completions, an in-editor agent, and one place to manage local and cloud Devin agents.vs Claude Code →
OpenAI CodexTerminal agentDelegating tasks to an agent in the terminal, IDE or desktop app, or to cloud tasks that run in the background and open pull requests.vs Claude Code →vs OpenCode →
GitHub CopilotEditor pluginAdding AI completions, chat and agents to the editor you already use, including VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, plus pull request reviews on GitHub.vs Claude Code →