Braintrust vs Helicone

Two sides of the LLM observability & evals decision: hosted eval platform and proxy logging. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

HeliconeProxy loggingllms.txt

In maintenance: Acquired by Mintlify in March 2026; Helicone says the service stays live in maintenance mode — security fixes, new model support and bug fixes, but no new product direction. source

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Braintrust if
  • Your main question is whether a prompt or model change made outputs better or worse

Use it whenYour main question is "did this change make outputs better or worse".

Trade-offClosed source, and the paid tier is priced for teams rather than hobby projects.

Choose Helicone if
  • You want request logs and costs today by changing one base URL

Use it whenYou want visibility today and your app makes direct model calls.

Trade-offProxy logging sees individual requests well but agent steps and eval workflows less deeply; acquired by Mintlify in March 2026, so check its roadmap before building on it.

At a glance

BraintrustHelicone
Used by5 makers' products · 10 open-source projects13 makers' products
Cost at default usagetraces 100k traces—$116/mo Pro
Downloads1.4M/wk+117% vs npm3.8k/wk
PricingFree tier with monthly usage credits; paid tier with usage overage; custom Enterprise, including self-hosted. · paid from $249/moFree tier with a monthly request limit; paid tiers with usage overage; custom Enterprise. Self-hosting is free (Apache 2.0). · paid from $79/mo
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceNoYes · self-hostable
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page9 (8 major)no public status feed

What makers say

Makers on using it for LLM observability & evals, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Braintrust

No maker quote about Braintrust for LLM observability & evals yet.

On Helicone
Helicone AI offers open-source observability tools tailored for developers working with LLMs. It simplifies debugging and optimization, providing valuable insights into AI model performance.
Persana, the makerSep 2026 ↗
I found Helicone in the middle of development, and it has been awesome. It gives me extremely useful and detailed insights on usage, costs, and response times, with just a couple of lines of code.
Image Ally, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Helps us debug AI, and have clarity on AI analytics, costs, and latency. We've also been able to save quite a lot of credits because of its caching functionality!
Pretty Prompt, the makerSep 2026 ↗
3 more on the Helicone page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

Braintrust
Most loved
  • Setting up datasets and running evals against different models is quick. HNHN 2HN 3
  • A solid eval platform for checking whether prompts produce consistent results. HNHN 2HN 3
Watch-outs
  • Its core dataset-and-pass-rate workflow is simple enough that teams say they could build it themselves. HNHN 2
  • Unlike Promptfoo or Laminar, it is closed source. HN
Helicone
Most loved
  • Setup takes a couple of lines of code and works as a proxy, so it suits stacks outside Python too. PHHN
  • Custom properties attribute LLM cost, latency and usage to individual customers or features. helicone.aiPH
  • Request logs and session views make it practical to debug issues coming from real users. PHhelicone.aiHN
Watch-outs
  • Acquired by Mintlify in March 2026; some developers report the product has since moved to maintenance mode. helicone.aiHN
  • Per-run cost breakdowns need manual labelling and custom SQL, since views are retrospective. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 13 reviews

Who uses each

What makers pair each with

With Helicone
Hosting
LangfuseOpen-source platformTracing, prompt management and evals in one tool you can run on your own server for free.vs Braintrust →vs Helicone →
Arize PhoenixOpen-source platformOpenTelemetry-based tracing and evals you can start locally in a notebook, then self-host or move to its cloud.
LangSmithHosted eval platformApps built on LangChain or LangGraph, where tracing works with almost no setup.vs Braintrust →vs Helicone →