Braintrust vs Langfuse
Two sides of the LLM observability & evals decision: hosted eval platform and open-source platform. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.
Which fits you
- Your main question is whether a prompt or model change made outputs better or worse
Use it whenYour main question is "did this change make outputs better or worse".
Trade-offClosed source, and the paid tier is priced for teams rather than hobby projects.
- You want tracing, prompts and evals in one tool you can self-host for free
Use it whenYou want to own your trace data or keep costs flat as volume grows.
Trade-offSelf-hosting means running Postgres, ClickHouse, Redis and object storage alongside it; otherwise it's a usage-based cloud plan.
At a glance
| Used by | 5 makers' products · 10 open-source projects | 33 makers' products · 43 open-source projects |
|---|---|---|
| Cost at default usagetraces 100k traces | — | $29/mo Core |
| Downloads | 1.4M/wk+117% vs npm | 1.8M/wk+81% vs npm |
| Pricing | Free tier with monthly usage credits; paid tier with usage overage; custom Enterprise, including self-hosted. · paid from $249/mo | Free tier (50k units/mo); usage-based paid plans; fully free to self-host under MIT license. · paid from $29/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes · self-hostable |
| Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page | 9 (8 major) | 15 (1 major) |
What makers say
Makers on using it for LLM observability & evals, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.
No maker quote about Braintrust for LLM observability & evals yet.
Marc gave me an in-person onboarding in SF - I found an issue in our LLM provider config just 30 minutes after the onboarding thanks to Langfuse. 10/10 recommendation
Langfuse powers our LLM observability. Without Langfuse, our AI agent would not be best-in-class. We have been using Langfuse since nearly the beginning: 2+ years!
We use Langfuse to keep track of our LLM prompts while building MCP-Builder.ai. It’s a great tool that makes it easy to monitor and analyze prompt performance, helping us improve quickly and efficiently.
Loved and watch-outs
Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.
- Detailed traces show each agent call and the context it pulled, which makes debugging agent behaviour much easier. PHPH 2HN
- Token usage and cost are tracked across providers alongside quality, in one place. PHPH 2HN
- Open source and self-hostable, a common default for teams wanting tracing on their own infrastructure. PHHNHN 2HN 3
- Prompt management and experiments feel basic next to the tracing core. HNHN 2HN 3
- Views are retrospective dashboards, so explaining one run's cost or failure still means reading trace trees by hand. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
- The ClickHouse acquisition raised GDPR and data-residency concerns for EU users of the cloud version. HNHN 2

