How Makers Build
Check my stackPlan my stack
Menu

Lovable vs v0

Two sides of the AI app builders decision: hosted app builder and code-first generator. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

LovableHosted app builderllms.txtMCP
v0Code-first generatorllms.txt
Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Lovable if
  • You want a working web app with sign-in and saved data without touching a backend

Use it whenYou want a working app with sign-in and saved data without touching a backend.

Trade-offCredit-based pricing, and larger changes get harder to steer by chat as the app grows.

Choose v0 if
  • You already have a Next.js project and want generated screens that fit into it

Use it whenYou already have a Next.js project and want generated screens that fit into it.

Trade-offOutput defaults to Vercel's stack (Next.js, Tailwind, shadcn/ui).

At a glance

Lovablev0
Used by73 makers' products41 makers' products · 1 open-source projects
Downloads33k/wk
PricingFree tier with daily credits; paid plans by monthly credits. · paid from $25/moFree tier with limited daily messages and credits; paid per-user plans add monthly credits billed by token usage. · paid from $30/user/mo
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceNoNo
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status page25+ (10 major)no public status feed

What makers say

Makers on using it for AI app builders, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Lovable
We used Lovable to quickly prototype workflows and test ideas before investing engineering time. It helped us move from rough concepts to working product flows in hours instead of days.
Lasso, the makerOct 2026 ↗
Lovable’s AI-first product workflows inspired me while building PromptCraft. Plus, many of the prompts generated here are optimized for tools like Lovable to kickstart creative projects.
PromptCraft, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Lovable built every pixel of Manta’s UI. Fast, clean, and exactly what an early-stage product needs — great output without the overhead of building a frontend from scratch.
Manta AI, the makerJul 2026 ↗
47 more on the Lovable page →
On v0
We use v0 to generate production-ready components from natural language prompts. It is core to our design system and helps us move faster by turning ideas into working prototypes almost instantly.
Zown, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Out of all the vibe-coding tools we tried, v0 was a real game-changer for Genpire’s MVP phase. Helped us move fast without overengineering early decisions.
Genpire, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Because PromptCraft turns your raw ideas into AI prompts you can plug directly into v0 to instantly prototype UIs. It’s one of the first tools I tested PromptCraft’s prompts with, and it works like magic together
PromptCraft, the makerSep 2026 ↗
24 more on the v0 page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

Lovable
Most loved
  • Turns an idea into a clickable prototype or MVP fast enough to put in front of real users without setup work. PHPH 2PH 3
  • Produces polished interfaces and landing pages from chat, handy for testing positioning with many page variants. PHPH 2
  • Non-technical staff build working internal tools and dashboards for themselves without engineers. HNHN 2PH
Watch-outs
  • Generated apps often ship with Supabase tables left open to the anon key because row-level security is misconfigured. HNHN 2
  • It picks its own stack and architecture, which can produce slow sites that non-technical owners cannot diagnose or prompt their way out of. HN
On Product Hunt: 4.7★, 208 reviews · mentioned most: fast prototyping, rapid application development, no code · complaints: buggy, complexity handling issues
v0
Most loved
  • Outputs clean React, Tailwind and shadcn/ui components that drop into an existing codebase. PHHN
  • Good design taste makes it a first stop for ideating on frontend UI and dashboards. PHPH 2HN
  • Gets a marketing site or clickable prototype live in hours instead of weeks. PHPH 2HN
Watch-outs
  • Apps tend to share the same default shadcn look and need design work to feel on-brand. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 4.9★, 60 reviews · mentioned most: prototyping, fast UI generation, AI-powered UI generation · complaints: not suitable for full production

Who uses each

Lovable73 makers' products
2prAgenda Hero MagicBanyan AI LiteBleetz NetworkBnbIconsBoxoCatchAll by NewsCatcherConnector.wtfCrowDecktlyDraftboardElsie AI+61 more
v041 makers' products
ArtMathCodeBasement BrowserBoxoBugsterCardioCladoConvocubicles.lolGenpireHipocapiArt.aiify+29 more
Used by both — often one replacing the other, or each for a different part of the product
BoxoPromptCraftWe0.ai

What makers pair each with

With Lovable
Database
Transactional Email
LLM API
Hosting
With v0
Frontend Framework
LLM API
Transactional Email
Database

Neither quite right?

See the whole AI app builders decision →
Base44Hosted app builderFull-stack web apps and internal tools from chat, with database, auth and hosting built into the platform, so there is no outside backend account to set up.vs Lovable →
BoltHosted app builderGenerating and running a full-stack app entirely in the browser, with the code visible and editable as it is written.
ReplitCloud IDE with agentBuilding with an AI agent in a full cloud IDE, in many languages, with hosting included.vs Lovable →vs v0 →