PostgreSQL vs Supabase

Two sides of the database decision: run it yourself and backend platform. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose PostgreSQL if
  • You already run your own server and want a flat monthly cost

Use it whenYou already run a server, or want extensions and settings a managed provider doesn't offer.

Trade-offBackups, upgrades, failover and connection pooling are yours to set up and watch.

Choose Supabase if
  • You want the database, auth and file storage in one project, and plain SQL you can take elsewhere

Use it whenYou want one service for most of the backend and a SQL database you can take with you.

Trade-offAuth, storage and database in one vendor makes leaving harder later, and free projects pause after a week without activity.

At a glance

PostgreSQLSupabase
Used by74 makers' products · 542 open-source projects564 makers' products · 75 open-source projects
Cost at default usagedatabase size 8 GB, data transfer 50 GB, document or row reads 10 million reads, document or row writes 2 million writes—$25/mo Pro
Moved to it on GitHubpull requests since Oct 202448+ from Supabase29+ from PostgreSQL
Downloads45.1M/wk+18% vs npm25.4M/wk+96% vs npm
PricingFree and open source under the PostgreSQL License; you pay only for the server or managed service that runs it.Free tier (inactive projects pause); paid plans per project plus usage. · paid from $25/mo
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceYes · self-hostableYes · self-hostable
Incidents, 90 daysfrom its status pageno public status feed50+ (16 major)

Who moves from one to the other

Public pull requests on GitHub since Oct 2024 whose title says "PostgreSQL to Supabase" or the reverse — real code changes, by developers in general rather than makers only.

Supabase → PostgreSQL48+ PRs
All matching pull requests on GitHub ↗
PostgreSQL → Supabase29+ PRs
All matching pull requests on GitHub ↗

What makers say

Makers on using it for database, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On PostgreSQL
Postgres is rock-solid. It handles complex data relationships gracefully and gives us the querying power we need as we scale. For relational data, it’s hands down the best choice for us.
VisionAR, the makerSep 2026 ↗
We picked PostgreSQL over MongoDB and dedicated vector databases because one proven database handles our relational data, JSON and agent memory, with no extra stores to run.
Semos.ai Manager Agents, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Postgres is so nice to work with. pg_dump was a lifesaver when we had to move database providers. Extensions like pgvector make it the best database for building AI apps.
CamelAI, the makerSep 2026 ↗
48 more on the PostgreSQL page →
On Supabase
One Postgres with RLS on every table is the reason a solo founder can ship contracts, invoices and a client portal without a backend team. Auth, storage and realtime came for free.
Accordio AI, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Supabase made it dead simple to manage db and the best part is that we can connect it to Claude for product analysis without having to set up Posthog or other event tracking tools.
Clico, the makerSep 2026 ↗
For powering our backend and database. Managing user uploads and conversion jobs efficiently is critical, and Supabase's real-time capabilities keep everything running smoothly! 🔥
Segwise, the makerSep 2026 ↗
403 more on the Supabase page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

PostgreSQL
Most loved
  • It is rock-solid, keeps data consistent with strong transactions, and handles complex relational queries well. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
  • With pgvector, embeddings live next to relational data, so AI features need no separate vector database. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
  • Extensions and features like PostGIS, JSON support and advanced indexing cover geospatial and semi-structured data too. PHPH 2PH 3
Watch-outs
  • Built-in full-text search lacks corpus-wide relevance ranking like BM25 and can need very large indexes. HNHN 2
  • It has no loose index scan, so SELECT DISTINCT over large tables needs manual workarounds. HNHN 2
  • Timestamp versus timestamptz and AT TIME ZONE behavior are easy to get wrong, with edge-case bugs around daylight saving. HNHN 2HN 3
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 77 reviews · mentioned most: reliability, performance, scalability
Supabase
Most loved
  • One project covers Postgres, auth, storage and realtime, so a solo founder ships without stitching vendors or hiring a backend team. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
  • It is real Postgres with SQL, row-level security and pgvector rather than a proprietary store. PHPH 2PH 3PH 4
  • Open source and self-hostable, which reduces vendor lock-in. PHPH 2HNPH 3
Watch-outs
  • Row-level security policies are hard to get right, so many apps end up exposing data publicly. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • Reliability has been shaky for some, and it is not really built for self-hosting in practice. HN
  • Per-project billing adds up for developers running many small side projects. HN
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 899 reviews · mentioned most: authentication features, easy setup, PostgreSQL integration · complaints: documentation gaps

Who uses each

Used by both — often one replacing the other, or each for a different part of the product

What makers pair each with

With Supabase
ConvexBackend platformRealtime, collaborative apps written entirely in TypeScript.vs Supabase →
FirebaseBackend platformMobile apps that need offline sync and client-side SDKs.vs Supabase →
NeonManaged databaseServerless Postgres that scales to zero, with a branch per preview deploy.vs PostgreSQL →vs Supabase →
PlanetScaleManaged databaseApps that expect heavy scale and want zero-downtime schema changes.vs Supabase →
TursoManaged databaseSQLite at the edge, or one database per customer.vs PostgreSQL →vs Supabase →
MongoDBManaged databaseDocument-shaped data and teams already fluent in Mongo.vs PostgreSQL →vs Supabase →