Appwrite vs Firebase

Two backend platform options for database. When each fits, what it costs, who moves from one to the other, and what makers who chose it say.

Ask your AI about this, with this page as the source:ChatGPT ↗Claude ↗Perplexity ↗

Which fits you

Choose Appwrite if
  • A Firebase-style backend — database, auth, storage, functions and messaging — that is open source and can be self-hosted.

Use it whenYou want a Firebase-like SDK experience but need the option to run it on your own servers.

Trade-offIts own document-style database API rather than plain SQL; self-hosting runs many containers.

Choose Firebase if
  • Mobile apps that need offline sync and client-side SDKs.

Use it whenYou're shipping a mobile app first and want the client to read and write data directly, including while offline.

Trade-offA document store without SQL joins; hard to migrate off.

At a glance

AppwriteFirebase
Used by8 makers' products · 1 open-source projects179 makers' products · 70 open-source projects
Cost at default usagedatabase size 8 GB, data transfer 50 GB, document or row reads 10 million reads, document or row writes 2 million writes—$9.66/mo Blaze (pay as you go)
Downloads53.6k/wk−28% vs npm8.8M/wk−21% vs npm
PricingFree to self-host; Appwrite Cloud has a free plan and paid per-project plans with usage limits.Free Spark plan; pay-as-you-go Blaze plan. · paid from Pay as you go (Blaze)
Free tierYesYes
Open sourceYes · self-hostableNo

What makers say

Makers on using it for database, from Product Hunt and Starter Story interviews, each linked to the source. Products with a page of their own and fuller notes first.

On Appwrite
Imagine is powered by Appwrite Cloud as its core infrastructure layer. We use Appwrite’s databases, auth, storage, messaging, and realtime services to generate production-ready applications, and Appwrite Sites to handle hosting and global distribution for every app Imagine creates.
Imagine, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Rubium has it's back-end fully powered by Appwrite Cloud, we always trusted the team and their awesome services thanks to the great documentation, ease of use and security compliance.
Rubium, the makerMar 2024 ↗
We used Appwrite to handle all the heavy backend stuff - user accounts, database, storage. It saved us time and headaches, so we could focus on building the actual product.
DeepGuard, the makerJun 2025 ↗
4 more on the Appwrite page →
On Firebase
Key role in helping us deliver results in real time, because the analysis streams onto the page as it completes instead of making founders wait for a finished report.
1752vc Pitch Deck Analyzer, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Firebase powers the backbone of uList, ensuring robust real-time data handling, secure authentication, and scalable backend infrastructure. It's the unsung hero making our app fast and reliable.
uList, the makerSep 2026 ↗
Google's Firebase powers ReplyMind with robust and scalable backend infrastructure. Its real-time database, cloud storage, and authentication services ensure a secure and reliable user experience.
ReplyMind, the makerSep 2026 ↗
108 more on the Firebase page →

Loved and watch-outs

Themes that recur in makers' words and Hacker News comments, each linked to what it summarises.

AppwriteOn Product Hunt: 4.7★, 31 reviews · mentioned most: all-in-one platform, authentication, backend as a service
Firebase
Most loved
  • Auth, Firestore, Cloud Functions and hosting wire up in minutes, the fastest path to a working backend for a solo developer. PHHN
  • Real-time sync across devices, with offline caching that remains stronger than most all-in-one rivals. PHHN
  • The free tier and serverless pricing keep costs near zero when starting out. PHPH 2
Watch-outs
  • A server-side change made the iOS SDK crash apps everywhere, exposing the risk of a closed SDK you cannot control. HNHN 2HN 3HN 4
  • It feels neglected and bolted onto Google Cloud, and it cannot be self-hosted, so leaving means a full migration. HNHN 2HN 3
  • Client-accessible databases guarded only by optional security rules are a common cause of data leaks. HNHN 2
On Product Hunt: 5.0★, 238 reviews · mentioned most: authentication, scalable backend, real-time database · complaints: complex documentation, complex setup

Who uses each

What makers pair each with

With Appwrite

Not enough makers' products to say yet.

With Firebase
SupabaseBackend platformPostgres plus auth, storage and realtime in one project.vs Appwrite →vs Firebase →
ConvexBackend platformRealtime, collaborative apps written entirely in TypeScript.
NeonManaged databaseServerless Postgres that scales to zero, with a branch per preview deploy.
PlanetScaleManaged databaseApps that expect heavy scale and want zero-downtime schema changes.
TursoManaged databaseSQLite at the edge, or one database per customer.
MongoDBManaged databaseDocument-shaped data and teams already fluent in Mongo.
PostgreSQLRun it yourselfThe engine behind most of the hosted options above, run on your own server or container for full control and a flat cost.